Indiana Jones Movies Ranked from Worst to Best


The inception of the Indiana Jones franchise actually began with the desire to make a film in another, already established film series. Steven Spielberg and George Lucas were on vacation together in 1977 during the opening weekend of Star Wars when Lucas asked Spielberg — who was in post-production on Close Encounters of the Third Kind at the time — what kind of film he wanted to make next. Spielberg said he’d always wanted to direct a James Bond film, to which Lucas replied, “Well I’ve got that beat.” The Star Wars filmmaker proceeded to pitch an adventure film in the vein of the 1930s and 40s serials starring a heroic archaeologist named Indiana Smith. Spielberg loved everything but the name, suggested Jones as the new surname, and thus one of the most enduring film franchises in history was born.

Though the Indiana Jones series only consists of four films so far (with a fifth now in production), it’s noteworthy in that it spans three decades yet was able to retain the same filmmaking team for each entry. The Bond comparisons are inescapable, but Spielberg, Lucas, and Harrison Ford crafted an iconic hero all their own who would be just as influential to the world of moviemaking — and the world at large — as the British spy.

The Indiana Jones franchise is also noteworthy in that no two films are too similar. Spielberg and Lucas were careful not to retread the formula of past movies, and while this resulted in a fresh story and structure each time out, not every entry was a home run. Below, I’ve revisited all four Indiana Jones films, digging into the merits and shortcomings of each entry in this beloved, long-lasting, and ongoing franchise.

4. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


Image via Lucasfilm

We begin with what is glaringly the worst of the bunch. One of the biggest problems with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is apparent from the opening frame, in which a distractingly CG-created groundhog pops his head out of a mound. Indiana Jones has always been about grand adventure using the best effects possible to put our hero in the greatest amount of danger, but a 21st century Indiana Jones movie already begins to feel false once incongruous CG effects begin to creep in. This permeates throughout the entire film, from Shia LaBeouf swingin’ on vines with animated monkeys, to a swarm of weightless computer-generated ants carrying communist soldiers to their death. As fake as some of the bugs in Temple of Doom may have looked, they still felt tangible in relation to the actors, and tangibility goes a long way towards sweeping the audience up in the adventures of Indiana Jones.

Unfortunately an overreliance on CG is only one of many issues plaguing the fourth Indiana Jones film. Even Cate Blanchett can’t make paranormal-obsessed villain Irina Spalko interesting; John Hurt is completely wasted as a walking, talking clue-pointer; the loyalty of Ray Winstone’s sidekick Mac doesn’t matter one bit because the character barely exists as-is; and LaBeouf performs with such emotional intensity that it feels like he’s in an entirely different film. Pretty much the only character dynamic worth anything in Crystal Skull is the one between Indy and Marion. Harrison Ford and Karen Allen easily slip back into their old rapport, giving the film a much needed boost when it begins to get bogged down by its own convoluted plot involving saucer men from Mars.

Some took issue with the fact that Indiana Jones would be dealing with aliens in the fourth Indy film, and while another religion-focused MacGuffin may have been more suitable, it makes sense for Lucas and Spielberg to want to tackle this particular kind of story when moving the series into the 1950s. The problem isn’t aliens; it’s the specific story they choose to tell. There’s no weight to the hunt for Crystal Skulls, and as Indiana Jones starts to rattle off various off-screen adventures he’s had since we last left him, we begin longing to see those stories instead.

“Uninteresting” is the operative word of Crystal Skull, from the story to the characters to even the set pieces. The truck sequence in the jungle is the least dull of the bunch, but even then it’s hard to care about what’s happening when we don’t really care about the characters themselves. Which is a shame, because Indiana Jones is undoubtedly one of the most interesting heroes to grace the silver screen. It took years for Spielberg, Lucas, and Ford to agree on a take for the fourth Indiana Jones film, but maybe they should’ve realized the difficulty in coming up with another satisfying film meant they probably should have left well enough alone.

RELATED: The Long Development History (and Alternate Versions) of ‘Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull’, Explained

3. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom


Image via Lucasfilm

Spielberg and Lucas began developing Temple of Doom pretty quickly after the success of Raiders of the Lost Ark, but from the onset they were intent on making a film that would be darker and very different from the first adventure. Lucas rooted this idea in how he approached Empire Strikes Back as the darkest entry in the Star Wars trilogy, but whereas that film simply went to some emotionally difficult places, Temple essentially becomes a horror film in its somewhat disturbingly pitch black third act.

Things begin promisingly enough in Temple of Doom as Spielberg opens the movie with a Busby Berkeley-esque musical number followed immediately by a thrilling showdown and shootout between Indy and Lao Che. But the first hints that we may be in for a bumpy ride arrive with Kate Capshaw’s nightclub singer Willie Scott. In keeping with Spielberg and Lucas’ desire not to repeat themselves, it makes sense that they’d want to craft a wholly different female companion for Indy in the follow-up, but making Willie Scott the opposite of Marion Ravenwood means Indy shares the screen with a grating, dim, and infuriatingly self-obsessed stereotype. Again, the intention behind Willie Scott was fine, but the execution is pitched way too severely towards damsel in distress as Willie screams and stomps like an angry toddler throughout most of the film’s runtime. And while her romantic interactions with Indy are meant to evoke the tone of classic screwball comedies, more often than not they fall flat. If Raiders reflects the best of the James Bond influence, Temple embraces some of that franchise’s worst tendencies when it comes to the hero/love interest dynamic.

Indy’s other companion, Short Round, is at least endearing enough to tolerate onscreen, and the chemistry between Ford and Jonathan Ke Quan results in the film’s most effective comedic moments — which are absolutely vital to keeping the darkness of the movie’s second half from engulfing the film whole. Indeed, Spielberg embraces certain aspects of the horror genre and B-movie cinema with the film’s violent finale, which certainly caught some audiences off guard. While Raiders ended in a similarly graphic fashion, it’s about balance — Temple litters the shock value throughout the entire third act, whereas Raiders saves the gore for the money shot at the very end.

Temple of Doom isn’t a bad movie — the booby-trap sequence on the way to the temple is one of Spielberg’s most effective set pieces ever, and the mine car chase in the finale is thrilling. But the lack of a strong companion, overreliance on the wrong kind of dark tone, and lessened focus on Indiana Jones as an intellectual makes it a somewhat less fulfilling entry in the franchise.

2. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade


Image via Lucasfilm

The brilliance of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is that it’s almost a stealth origin story. You think you’re just watching the next adventure of Indiana Jones, but in fact the entire film is telling the audience where Indy came from and why he is the way he is. The movie literally begins with Young Indy, as Spielberg channels his love of Westerns with a thrilling that runs through the foundation of some of Indy’s hallmark traits, all in the midst of an elaborate and supremely entertaining chase sequence. River Phoenix is pitch perfect casting as the young Indiana Jones, composer John Williams gets playful with some of the best work of his career, and it all culminates with the introduction of Indy’s father followed by an inspired cut to adult Indy hunting the same MacGuffin decades later. And that’s just the first 15 minutes.

Last Crusade is the most ambitious film of the franchise, as Spielberg and Lucas send their hero on a globe-trotting adventure to recover yet another all-important religious artifact. But the “adventure” is, for all intents and purposes, a facade. The crux of the story lies in Indy rekindling and accepting his relationship with his father, who in another case of spot on casting is played by James Bond himself, Sean Connery. The dynamic between Ford and Connery is wonderfully executed. It’s combative but never mean-spirited, and despite their estrangement they assume dominant and submissive roles in the most subtle of ways, many times evoking the entire relationship with a simple look.

The film also acts as Spielberg and Lucas’ rebuke to Temple of Doom. It relishes the talk-y intellectual moments of Raiders and eschews the more grotesque aspects of Temple in favor of comedy and snappy dialogue. Indeed, at times this tonal course-correction goes a little overboard, losing a bit of the drama along the way (Hitler signing Indy’s Grail Diary is just silly), but overall it finds a nice balance and culminates in a wonderfully affecting finale with the highest emotional stakes of the series.

1. Raiders of the Lost Ark


Image via Lucasfilm

Honestly The Last Crusade makes a strong case for the best of the Indiana Jones bunch, but ultimately the consistent sharpness and God-tier level filmmaking of Raiders of the Lost Ark nudges it just ahead to the top spot. There’s not a false note to be found in Spielberg’s buoyant, adventurous thrill ride. Karen Allen’s Marion Ravenwood is just as compelling as Indy himself, but isn’t an attempt to create a female copy of the eponymous hero. The chemistry between the two drives the film, as does Ford’s mix of moxie, smarts, and luck that brings Indiana Jones to vivid life.

What makes Jones a unique action hero is that he’s always a little bit in over his head. He doesn’t have every beat worked out 30 steps in advance — there’s an on-the-fly quality to his attitude that makes the ride that much more enjoyable, because as an audience member you don’t necessarily feel like Indiana Jones can survive anything. He does, mind you, but it’s always a close call. The iconic image of Indy always reaching at the last moment to grab his hat is not only clever, it’s indicative of Indiana Jones as a whole. He makes it out in one piece, but often by the skin of his nose.

Spielberg brilliantly sets up the world and the hero in the film’s prologue, which takes a cue from Bond by beginning the film with a set piece that’s only tangentially related to the rest of the plot. But we learn almost all we need to know about Indy in that first sequence, and then the character is even further fleshed out in the next sequence, in which this dashing hero is revealed to be a highly intelligent professor at Marshall College. What sets this apart from a “secret identity” dynamic as seen in superhero stories is that Jones’ day job and adventures are one and the same — he relishes knowledge and action, and doesn’t even necessarily need to hide one facet of his being from the other.

Looking back on Raiders of the Lost Ark now, it’s refreshing to see just how dialogue and character-driven the film is as a “blockbuster” movie. It’s an action-adventure movie, sure, but the bulk of the runtime is made up of interactions between human beings, not explosions and set pieces. And the set pieces that Spielberg does present are all the better for it, because the audience isn’t being inundated with adrenaline shot after adrenaline shot. They come at opportune moments, they’re impeccably crafted, and they’re wholly character-driven. Combine that balance with some of the most compelling characters put to screen, throw in a hefty dose of Harrison Ford’s charm and vulnerability, and you’ve got a recipe for an enduring masterpiece.

KEEP READING: All Four Indiana Jones Movies Getting 4K UHD Releases for the First Time


The ‘Universal Soldier’ Sequels Show How to Save a Bad Franchise

How two direct-to-video movies redeemed an entire franchise.

Read Next

About The Author

Adam Chitwood
(15803 Articles Published)

Adam Chitwood is the Managing Editor for Collider. He’s been working for Collider for over a decade, and in addition to managing content also runs point on crafts interviews, awards coverage, and co-hosts The Collider Podcast with Matt Goldberg (which has been running since 2012). He’s the creator and author of Collider’s “How the MCU Was Made” series and has interviewed Bill Hader about every single episode of Barry. He lives in Tulsa, OK and likes pasta, 90s thrillers, and spending like 95% of his time with his dog Luna.

From Adam Chitwood


Lütfen yorumunuzu giriniz!
Lütfen isminizi buraya giriniz